Clear guides, original reporting and a closer look at VA claims.
279 articles · All sections
The C&P exam showed motion too good for a higher rating. The examiner couldn't measure flare-ups. So the Board used the veteran's own credible testimony to grant 20 percent. Here's exactly how lay evidence carried the day.
A factual Trajector Medical review: the five-times fee in its own client agreement, the July 2026 Chapter 11 filing, and the New York and Illinois attorney general investigations.
Three annotated VA nexus letter examples show what a doctor's opinion has to explain for direct, secondary and aggravation claims, with short passages from real Board decisions and a blank template for your clinician.
A factual VA Claims Insider review: the six-times fee model and its $15,000 cap, the refund terms, and what the Texas Attorney General case settled in 2026.
The Board weighs a nexus letter by its facts and reasoning, not its wording. See the legal standard, how opinion quality lined up with Board outcomes, and a record-by-record check for the letter you have.
Urology C&P exams come back adequate 72.8% of the time. Sleep medicine C&P exams come back adequate 26.3%. Same system, two different reports.
A veteran filed for a skin condition with a diagnosis, a doctor's letter, and her own statement. VA decided the claim without ever ordering an exam. Here's why the Board sent it back.
Complete fictional VA buddy letter examples: a wife's statement about sleep apnea, a spouse letter for back pain, a spouse letter for PTSD, a coworker and a service buddy, plus a fill-in template and a fact-or-opinion check.
Is VetComm legit? A factual review: the $1,497 course-and-coaching model, the refund conditions in the terms, the common complaints, the 98 percent claim, and the cheaper alternatives.
A source-linked VetClaims.ai review covering the $1,250 price, complaints, public lawsuits, guarantees, accreditation, privacy, and alternatives.
One email per week with new guides, reports and VA updates. Unsubscribe anytime.