Skip to main content
Menu

VA disability appeal statistics, with the methods behind them.

Explore outcomes and evidence patterns in Claim Raven's analyzed Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions. Each chart identifies the sample it uses.

  • 101,518 condition records
  • 501,000+ Board decisions in the library
  • Updated August 6, 2026

The VA claims system at a glance

For scale, the official numbers: the Veterans Benefits Administration reports completing more than 2.5 million disability compensation and pension claims in 2024 and paying over 173 billion dollars in compensation and pension benefits that year (VBA detailed claims data). Population, expenditure, and utilization statistics live at the National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, and condition-level claim volumes are published in the VBA Annual Benefits Report.

What those official sources do not publish is what happens when a claim is appealed and why. That is the gap this page covers, from the decisions themselves.

How Board appeals end

Across 101,518 condition records with a classified outcome, denial is the most common result, but the striking number is the remand rate. 26.6% of these records are not decided at all. They go back down for more development, which is added wait time that no published VA statistic surfaces this way.

Board outcome distribution

Granted 29,968 decisions 29.5% Partial grant / mixed 248 decisions 0.2% Denied 41,447 decisions 40.8% Remanded 26,962 decisions 26.6% Dismissed 2,882 decisions 2.8% Source: 101,518 condition records from an analyzed subset of Claim Raven's 501,000+ Board-decision library (predominantly 2024-2025). Board outcomes on appealed claims, not initial-claim outcomes. Associations, not causes. claimraven.com/va-disability-statistics · CC BY 4.0

This chart is a census of every analyzed condition record, so its bars are shares of all 101,518 rows and they add to 100%. Every grant rate elsewhere on this page is computed differently, over decided appeals only: the 2.8% dismissed here and the small withdrawn and moot residue are left out of both halves of a rate, because the Board never decided those issues. Partial grants and mixed outcomes get their own bar rather than hiding in "other" so the two views reconcile by hand.

The evidence gradient: grant rate by nexus quality

A nexus is the medical link between a condition and service. The analysis pipeline classifies the nexus evidence discussed in each decision, and the gradient across those tiers is the strongest pattern in the dataset: appeals with strong medical-link evidence were granted 89.7% of the time, appeals with weak evidence 3.7% of the time.

Grant rate by nexus evidence quality

Strong 12,502 decisions 89.7% Adequate 18,592 decisions 69.2% Weak 18,253 decisions 3.7% Missing 10,700 decisions 1.6% No nexus question 35,207 decisions 14.0% Source: 101,518 condition records from an analyzed subset of Claim Raven's 501,000+ Board-decision library (predominantly 2024-2025). Board outcomes on appealed claims, not initial-claim outcomes. Associations, not causes. claimraven.com/va-disability-statistics · CC BY 4.0

Two honest notes. First, this is an association: cases with strong nexus evidence may be stronger cases in other ways too. Second, the "no nexus question" tier (rating-increase appeals and similar, where service connection was not in dispute) granted 14.0% of the time, which shows other factors matter alongside the medical link.

Board outcomes by condition

Outcome rates for every condition label with at least 300 decided appeals (129 labels). Click a column header to sort. Labels come from Claim Raven's extraction taxonomy, not official VA issue codes, so counts reflect extraction volume rather than VA workload.

Board outcomes by condition, 129 labels. Scrollable region.
Condition Decided Not decided Granted Denied Remanded
COPD 3,218 0 30.4% 30.7% 38.9%
GERD 2,248 0 36.7% 37.4% 25.9%
Sinusitis 2,199 0 30.9% 46.5% 22.6%
TBI 2,196 0 28.3% 51.0% 20.6%
Eczema 2,002 0 39.9% 27.8% 32.3%
Adjustment Disorder 1,621 0 42.6% 46.8% 10.6%
PTSD 1,609 31 45.4% 28.2% 26.4%
Anxiety secondary to Chronic Pain 1,265 2 33.6% 57.6% 8.8%
Anxiety 1,194 3 49.8% 37.2% 13.0%
Tinnitus 1,123 89 47.6% 28.3% 24.1%
Sleep Apnea 1,115 0 38.2% 24.7% 37.1%
Heart Arrhythmia 1,111 0 35.5% 25.9% 38.6%
Hearing Loss 1,111 19 21.5% 47.2% 31.3%
Knee 1,059 57 30.6% 27.0% 42.4%
Lumbar Spine 1,037 0 35.9% 24.9% 39.2%
Sleep Apnea secondary to PTSD 1,019 15 28.2% 32.9% 39.0%
Anxiety secondary to Heart Disease 1,011 0 18.5% 72.3% 9.2%
Asthma secondary to Burn Pit 976 0 30.5% 51.2% 18.2%
IBS 968 0 45.0% 47.2% 7.7%
Prostate 960 0 48.1% 38.5% 13.3%
Kidney Disease 958 0 30.6% 33.4% 36.0%
Fibromyalgia 953 0 23.2% 53.5% 23.3%
Vertigo 913 0 33.4% 39.3% 27.3%
Chronic Fatigue 911 0 16.1% 58.3% 25.6%
Spinal Stenosis 909 0 30.3% 38.7% 31.0%
Flat Feet 903 0 37.2% 44.9% 17.9%
Parkinson's 892 0 38.2% 30.8% 30.9%
Wrist 872 0 25.6% 49.0% 25.5%
Migraines 869 0 40.7% 25.5% 33.7%
Scoliosis 863 0 16.6% 54.3% 29.1%
Gulf War Illness 848 0 24.9% 49.3% 25.8%
Secondary Service Connection 834 0 42.3% 20.5% 37.2%
Vision Loss 764 0 25.0% 50.8% 24.2%
Arthritis 753 0 27.5% 38.2% 34.3%
Tmj secondary to Dental 751 14 23.0% 41.5% 35.4%
Schizophrenia 748 1 40.5% 36.0% 23.5%
Migraines secondary to Cervical 720 0 22.2% 50.8% 26.9%
Gout 714 0 20.3% 37.1% 42.6%
Depression 709 1 33.3% 38.6% 28.1%
Peripheral Vascular 682 0 14.2% 59.5% 26.2%
Acne 674 0 16.2% 48.8% 35.0%
Hypertension 667 0 34.2% 30.6% 35.2%
Hypertension secondary to Obesity 666 0 17.7% 44.9% 37.4%
Radiculopathy secondary to Lumbar 665 0 48.1% 23.2% 28.7%
Lung Cancer 649 0 40.1% 32.8% 27.1%
Radiculopathy secondary to Cervical 641 0 22.2% 49.1% 28.7%
Shoulder 621 0 20.9% 40.3% 38.8%
Depression secondary to Diabetes 620 0 21.9% 50.5% 27.6%
Depression secondary to Tinnitus 620 0 42.3% 27.4% 30.3%
Hemorrhoids 618 0 22.3% 71.0% 6.6%
Special Monthly Compensation 615 53 43.3% 28.0% 28.8%
Bipolar 612 0 44.1% 45.6% 10.3%
Elbow 609 0 24.5% 57.3% 18.2%
Prostate Cancer 597 0 49.9% 36.5% 13.6%
Gout secondary to Kidney 590 183 23.1% 20.5% 56.4%
Ankle 586 0 35.7% 24.1% 40.3%
Sciatica 583 0 23.8% 51.8% 24.4%
Asthma 577 0 43.7% 41.6% 14.7%
Skin Cancer 569 0 35.1% 31.3% 33.6%
Diverticulitis 553 21 15.0% 32.2% 52.8%
Hypothyroidism 549 0 40.4% 49.2% 10.4%
Radiculopathy secondary to Ddd 546 86 42.1% 24.9% 33.0%
Bladder 540 0 48.0% 45.7% 6.3%
Bunions 513 0 18.7% 60.4% 20.9%
Bladder Cancer 502 0 47.4% 43.2% 9.4%
Chronic Fatigue Gulf War 500 0 21.8% 66.0% 12.2%
COPD secondary to Burn Pit 500 0 29.0% 48.4% 22.6%
Hypertension secondary to Diabetes 500 0 24.4% 49.0% 26.6%
ED secondary to Hypertension 500 0 12.6% 70.2% 17.2%
IBS Gulf War 500 0 43.0% 43.0% 14.0%
GERD secondary to PTSD 500 0 29.8% 48.4% 21.8%
ED secondary to Diabetes 500 0 16.8% 66.4% 16.8%
Kidney secondary to Agent Orange Diabetes 500 0 37.2% 51.8% 11.0%
Kidney secondary to Diabetes 500 0 38.0% 48.4% 13.6%
Kidney secondary to Hypertension 500 0 36.4% 50.4% 13.2%
Dry Eye 500 0 46.4% 41.6% 12.0%
Glaucoma 500 0 19.0% 52.2% 28.8%
Hypertension secondary to PTSD 500 0 17.6% 52.8% 29.6%
Fibromyalgia Gulf War 500 0 30.2% 58.4% 11.4%
Foot 500 0 25.6% 36.6% 37.8%
Stroke secondary to Hypertension 500 0 29.2% 49.6% 21.2%
Stroke secondary to Diabetes 500 0 28.8% 49.2% 22.0%
Migraines secondary to PTSD 500 0 30.0% 52.4% 17.6%
Migraines secondary to TBI 500 0 34.6% 49.0% 16.4%
Stroke secondary to Afib 500 0 29.6% 50.0% 20.4%
Cancer 500 73 33.2% 22.4% 44.4%
Epilepsy 500 0 22.4% 37.2% 40.4%
Sleep Apnea secondary to Sinusitis 500 0 33.4% 37.8% 28.8%
Parkinson's secondary to Agent Orange 500 0 51.8% 38.8% 9.4%
Cataracts 500 0 19.8% 49.4% 30.8%
Depression secondary to Lumbar 500 0 20.0% 53.4% 26.6%
GERD secondary to Medications 500 0 41.8% 36.8% 21.4%
Sinusitis secondary to Burn Pit 500 0 40.8% 49.0% 10.2%
ED secondary to Medications 499 0 19.8% 63.1% 17.0%
Hepatitis 499 0 22.4% 58.1% 19.4%
Depression secondary to Chronic Pain 499 0 24.0% 51.9% 24.0%
Temporomandibular 499 0 21.4% 51.3% 27.3%
IBS secondary to PTSD 498 0 18.9% 67.5% 13.7%
Effective Date 496 9 46.6% 32.7% 20.8%
Thoracic Spine 495 11 27.1% 46.3% 26.7%
Leukemia 488 70 43.9% 20.3% 35.9%
Scars 484 21 36.6% 28.9% 34.5%
Degenerative Disc 483 25 35.0% 34.0% 31.1%
Menieres 478 27 32.2% 24.3% 43.5%
Neuropathy secondary to Diabetes 478 27 24.3% 30.8% 45.0%
Rheumatoid Arthritis 476 29 13.4% 27.9% 58.6%
Psoriasis 474 31 24.5% 28.1% 47.5%
Substance Abuse 474 31 33.3% 34.4% 32.3%
Diabetes 469 62 24.5% 31.6% 43.9%
Colon Cancer 468 58 29.5% 23.3% 47.2%
Diabetic Retinopathy 463 94 27.2% 29.6% 43.2%
Herniated Disc 460 91 25.7% 31.7% 42.6%
Cervical Spine 460 83 25.2% 30.2% 44.6%
Lymphoma 459 73 34.4% 26.6% 39.0%
Neuropathy 459 46 27.9% 28.1% 44.0%
Tdiu 453 65 51.2% 23.2% 25.6%
Varicose Veins 447 78 16.8% 32.2% 51.0%
Diabetic Retinopathy secondary to Diabetes 435 118 26.4% 29.4% 44.1%
Sleep Apnea secondary to Obesity 407 93 42.5% 21.9% 35.6%
Ulcerative Colitis 389 0 22.6% 38.3% 39.1%
Neuropathy secondary to Agent Orange Diabetes 341 160 27.0% 25.2% 47.8%
Heart Disease 323 0 31.0% 35.6% 33.4%
Sleep Apnea secondary to Weight Gain 316 184 37% of rows 36.4% 17.7% 45.9%
Hypertension secondary to Sleep Apnea 312 353 53% of rows 17.6% 15.1% 67.3%
Heart Disease secondary to Agent Orange Diabetes 310 0 25.8% 45.2% 29.0%
Heart Disease secondary to Hypertension 310 0 26.1% 43.9% 30.0%
Heart Disease secondary to Diabetes 310 0 20.6% 49.7% 29.7%
Hip 305 0 12.8% 42.0% 45.2%
Pulmonary Fibrosis 301 0 33.9% 37.2% 28.9%

The three percentages are shares of the "Decided" count on the same row, so they add to 100%. "Granted" counts partial grants and mixed outcomes alongside full grants, because a partial grant awards a benefit the veteran did not have. "Not decided" is the dismissed, withdrawn, and moot appeals excluded from the rate; it is small for most labels but exceeds a third for a few secondary conditions, and a large value there means the published rate rests on fewer decisions than the label's extraction volume suggests. Those rows carry the share in the "Not decided" column, so you can see which rates rest on a narrow base. These are the same figures the per-condition pages under /conditions publish. Source: Claim Raven analysis of 101,518 condition records from the analyzed subset of its 501,000+ Board-decision library (predominantly 2024-2025). Board outcomes on appealed claims, not initial-claim outcomes. Associations, not causes.

4 labels are excluded pending manual review of extraction quality, because at least 80% of their extracted rows lack a classifiable nexus question: Anxiety secondary to Tinnitus (865 decisions), Erectile Dysfunction (782 decisions), Heart Disease secondary to Sleep Apnea (500 decisions), ED secondary to PTSD (499 decisions).

Low grant rates in this table usually trace back to evidence, not the condition itself. Chronic fatigue, for example, granted 16.1% overall, but 83.7% when the decision discussed strong nexus evidence. Most of its appeals simply arrived with weak or missing medical-link evidence.

Secondary claims are not doomed. Unsupported ones are.

In the raw numbers, claims for secondary conditions (a condition caused by an already service-connected one) fare worse than primary claims. That gap disappears once you hold evidence quality constant. Within the same nexus tier, secondary claims granted at essentially the same rate as primary claims:

Nexus evidencePrimary claims grantedSecondary claims granted
Strong 88.3% (n=9,529) 94.1% (n=2,973)
Adequate 69.4% (n=13,241) 68.5% (n=5,351)
Weak 4.3% (n=13,757) 1.7% (n=4,496)
Missing 1.9% (n=8,314) 0.5% (n=2,386)

Source: Claim Raven analysis of 101,518 condition records from the analyzed subset of its 501,000+ Board-decision library (predominantly 2024-2025). Board outcomes on appealed claims, not initial-claim outcomes. Associations, not causes.

The practical reading: the secondary-claim penalty in the raw data is a composition effect. Secondary claims more often arrive without classified medical-link evidence, and that, not the word "secondary," tracks with the outcome.

Lay evidence: how buddy statements correlate with outcomes

Decisions that quoted lay evidence (personal statements, buddy letters) granted 41.5% of the time (n=38,143), against 22.0% when lay evidence went unquoted (n=39,008). The gradient by how the Board treated that evidence:

Grant rate by how the Board treated lay evidence

Decisive 8,276 decisions 73.2% Supportive 19,877 decisions 51.9% Mentioned 11,589 decisions 15.3% Not addressed 21,264 decisions 9.5% Source: 101,518 condition records from an analyzed subset of Claim Raven's 501,000+ Board-decision library (predominantly 2024-2025). Board outcomes on appealed claims, not initial-claim outcomes. Associations, not causes. claimraven.com/va-disability-statistics · CC BY 4.0

The honest nuance: lay evidence does not rescue a weak medical case. Where nexus evidence was weak and lay evidence was quoted anyway, the grant rate was 4.0% (n=7,898). The Board may also simply discuss lay evidence more in cases that are stronger overall. Quoted is not the same as submitted, and correlation is not cause.

Definitions

Granted
The Board decided the issue in the veteran's favor. This includes partial grants and mixed outcomes, where the Board awarded some of what was sought, because those award a benefit the veteran did not have before.
Denied
The Board decided the issue against the veteran.
Remanded
The Board sent the issue back to the agency of original jurisdiction for more development. Not a final decision; the claim continues, with added wait time.
Decided
Granted, denied, or remanded. Every grant rate on this page divides favorable outcomes by decided appeals.
Not decided
Dismissed, withdrawn, or moot appeals, where the Board never reached the issue. Excluded from both halves of a grant rate, and reported as a separate count so the gap stays visible.
Nexus
The medical link between a current condition and military service (or an already service-connected condition, for secondary claims). Usually established through medical opinions and records.
Lay evidence
Non-expert statements from the veteran or people who know them, such as personal statements and buddy letters.
Secondary claim
A claim that one condition was caused or aggravated by another condition that is already service connected.

Methodology and limitations

  • Source: an analyzed subset of Claim Raven's 501,000+ public Board of Veterans' Appeals decision library. Decision dates are predominantly 2024-2025.
  • Unit of analysis: the condition record, not the decision. The Board often rules on several claimed conditions in one decision, and the extraction stores one row per condition per decision, producing 101,518 analyzed records. Every rate and count on this page is computed over condition records unless it says otherwise. A rate here is therefore the share of claimed conditions that ended a given way, not the share of veterans or the share of decisions.
  • These are Board outcomes, not initial claim outcomes. Every case in the dataset was appealed, which is a selected population. Nothing here is a "VA claim approval rate."
  • Condition labels are Claim Raven's extraction taxonomy, not official VA issue codes. Counts per label reflect extraction, not VA workload statistics.
  • All relationships are associations, not causes. Extraction is imperfect; sample sizes and coverage are stated with each figure, and labels that fail internal quality review are excluded and listed rather than published.
  • Percentages are computed over analyzed condition records only. The corpus count is context about the pipeline, never the base of a percentage.
  • Grant rate = favorable outcomes (granted, partial grant, mixed) divided by decided appeals (favorable + denied + remanded). Dismissed, withdrawn, and moot appeals are excluded from both halves because the Board never decided the issue. Of 101,518 condition records, 98,625 were decided and 2,890 were not. This is the same definition used by the per-condition pages under /conditions and the diagnostic code pages under /va-codes, so a given condition reads the same rate everywhere on this site.
  • The outcome census in "How Board appeals end" is the one exception: it is a breakdown of every analyzed row by its recorded outcome, so dismissed appeals appear there as their own bar rather than being excluded.
  • Outcome census covers the 101,518 condition records with a classified outcome. The nexus gradient covers the 60,047 decided condition records where nexus quality was classified into one of the four evidence tiers.

Cite this research

Keep its source, sample size, and date with it. See the citation and reuse details below before publishing an excerpt.

This page is free to cite and link. The statistics and charts are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license: reuse them anywhere with attribution to Claim Raven. Charts can be downloaded with their source line included. Suggested citation:

Claim Raven (2026). VA Disability Claims Statistics: Board of Veterans' Appeals Outcomes. Analysis of 101,518 condition records from the analyzed subset of Claim Raven's 501,000+ Board-decision library. https://claimraven.com/va-disability-statistics

Questions about the data or requests for other cuts: contact Claim Raven. For journalists, the methodology above travels with every number, and specific breakdowns can be re-run on request.

Update history

  • August 7, 2026: corrected the unit of analysis. This page previously called 101,518 the number of Board decisions analyzed, including in its headline and suggested citation. That figure is a count of condition records. The extraction stores one row per claimed condition per decision, and the Board often rules on several conditions at once. The decision count was overstated by about two times wherever it appeared. No rate, percentage, or chart changed, because all were already computed over condition records and their denominators were correct; only the labels were wrong. If you cited this page before this date, the sample description needs updating but the numbers you quoted do not.
  • August 6, 2026: corrected the grant-rate definition. Rates on this page previously counted only the outcome value "granted" and divided by every analyzed decision, including dismissed appeals the Board never decided. They now count partial grants and mixed outcomes as grants and divide by decided appeals, which is the definition the per-condition pages under /conditions already used. The two surfaces had published different rates for the same condition; PTSD read 38.9% here and 45.4% there, and 23 conditions disagreed. Most condition rates rise slightly as a result; a few secondary-condition labels rise by 5 to 13 points, because dismissals were concentrated in them. The nexus gradient moved by under one point. One label, neuropathy secondary to lumbar, dropped out of the table because it has fewer than 300 decided appeals.
  • August 3, 2026: first publication. 101,518 analyzed condition records.

Explore the research

Read the methods · Explore the evidence research · All published research

Conditions Library · Evidence checklists · Resume Raven