Clear guides, original reporting and a closer look at VA claims.
279 articles · All sections
The VA has revised its M21-1 adjudication manual section covering musculoskeletal disabilities of the extremities and spine, specifically updating shin splints rating guidance. If you have a pending or planned claim involving lower-leg pain, this change affects how raters review your file.
The VA revised its M21-1 manual section governing effective dates tied to liberalizing law changes. If you have a claim touching a new presumptive, a rule change, or a statutory expansion, the effective date assigned to your award can shift by months or years depending on how this guidance is applied.
The VA has revised the M21-1 manual section governing how raters handle claims for disabilities linked to mustard gas and Lewisite exposure. If you or a family member served in an era with documented chemical warfare agent testing or exposure, this update affects how your claim is processed.
The VA has relocated its COVID-19 presumptive service connection guidance into a dedicated M21-1 chapter at Part VIII, Subpart iii, Chapter 11. If you served during the pandemic and developed lasting health issues tied to COVID-19, this organizational change affects how raters evaluate your claim.
The VA revised M21-1, Part II, Subpart iii, Chapter 1, Section A to clarify guidance on unclaimed theories of service connection. If you filed a claim without specifying every legal path to service connection, this change directly affects how your claim should be developed.
The VA revised M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, Chapter 5, Section B, updating how adjudicators sever service connection. If you hold a rating that could be reexamined, the new guidance shapes the burden of proof and procedures the VA must follow before taking your benefits away.
The VA revised M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, Chapter 1, Section B, clarifying when adjudicators must order a C&P exam or medical opinion in claims alleging aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected disability. Here is how the change affects your secondary claim strategy.
The VA revised M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iv, Chapter 4, Section A to incorporate the CAVC decision in Laska v. McDonough and clarify how adjudicators establish entitlement to Special Monthly Compensation under subsection (t). If you have a severe traumatic brain injury claim or any SMC issue under review, this matters.
How VA applies 38 CFR 4.59 to painful motion, minimum compensable ratings, flare-ups, functional loss, and the evidence a joint exam should capture.
The VA updated M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, Chapter 2, Section D to incorporate Spicer v. McDonough and clarify how raters evaluate aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one. If you have a secondary claim or an Allen aggravation theory pending, this revision changes how your evidence will be read.
One email per week with new guides, reports and VA updates. Unsubscribe anytime.