Skip to main content
Menu

Federal statute · 38 USC § 7292

38 USC 7292: Federal Circuit review of Veterans Court decisions

§ 7292. Review by United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Claim Raven explanation

What this means

This section authorizes Federal Circuit review of Veterans Court decisions on legal validity and interpretation, including statutes, regulations, and constitutional questions. Except for constitutional issues, it generally excludes factual challenges and disputes about applying law to a particular case's facts.

The Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over challenges to the validity or interpretation of statutes and regulations presented under this section. A Veterans Court judge or panel can certify a controlling legal question for possible interlocutory review when the statutory conditions are met; the petition for that certified question has the specific ten-day period stated here. Filing or allowance does not stay the Veterans Court case unless a court orders a stay.

How this helps your claim

The Federal Circuit is not another fact-finding level for a benefits claim. Its jurisdiction centers on legal questions relied on by the Veterans Court, with a narrow certified interlocutory process for a controlling legal question.

What to check in your records

Identify the exact legal interpretation or constitutional issue and separate it from disagreement with factual findings.

  • Keep the Veterans Court decision and the legal rule it interpreted.
  • Preserve the notice of appeal, certification, petition, and docket entries.
  • Identify which issues are legal, factual, or application-of-law questions.

Frame the issue as law, fact, or application

Quote the legal interpretation in the Veterans Court decision and identify the statute, regulation, or constitutional provision involved. Then explain why the challenge concerns validity or interpretation rather than reweighing evidence.

Verify all filing requirements from current Federal Circuit and Veterans Court rules. The ordinary notice-of-appeal period is incorporated by reference to other federal appeal law, while the ten-day language in subsection (b) applies only to the certified interlocutory process.

Can the Federal Circuit reconsider the medical facts of my claim?

Generally no. Outside a constitutional issue, this section bars review of factual determinations and challenges to law or regulation as applied to the facts. Federal Circuit review focuses on legal validity and interpretation.

Put this information to use

See what your claim document supports

Start a free Claim Readiness Review to see what one document supports and what may be missing. Choose your document, then confirm your email to run the review.

One free review per verified email. The review does not predict a rating or guarantee a VA decision. You decide what to file.

Official statutory text

38 USC § 7292

OLRC release: pl-119-108. Layout and spacing are adapted for reading. The statutory text is shown here; publisher source credits and editorial notes remain in the linked official release.

§ 7292. Review by United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

(a) After a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is entered in a case, any party to the case may obtain a review of the decision with respect to the validity of a decision of the Court on a rule of law or of any statute or regulation (other than a refusal to review the schedule of ratings for disabilities adopted under section 1155 of this title) or any interpretation thereof (other than a determination as to a factual matter) that was relied on by the Court in making the decision. Such a review shall be obtained by filing a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within the time and in the manner prescribed for appeal to United States courts of appeals from United States district courts.

(b)(1) When a judge or panel of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, in making an order not otherwise appealable under this section, determines that a controlling question of law is involved with respect to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and that there is in fact a disagreement between the appellant and the Secretary with respect to that question of law and that the ultimate termination of the case may be materially advanced by the immediate consideration of that question, the judge or panel shall notify the chief judge of that determination. Upon receiving such a notification, the chief judge shall certify that such a question is presented, and any party to the case may then petition the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to decide the question. That court may permit an interlocutory appeal to be taken on that question if such a petition is filed with it within 10 days after the certification by the chief judge of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Neither the application for, nor the granting of, an appeal under this paragraph shall stay proceedings in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, unless a stay is ordered by a judge of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims or by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

(2) For purposes of subsections (d) and (e) of this section, an order described in this paragraph shall be treated as a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

(c) The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction to review and decide any challenge to the validity of any statute or regulation or any interpretation thereof brought under this section, and to interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, to the extent presented and necessary to a decision. The judgment of such court shall be final subject to review by the Supreme Court upon certiorari, in the manner provided in section 1254 of title 28.

(d)(1) The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall decide all relevant questions of law, including interpreting constitutional and statutory provisions. The court shall hold unlawful and set aside any regulation or any interpretation thereof (other than a determination as to a factual matter) that was relied upon in the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit finds to be—

(A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law;

(B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity;

(C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or in violation of a statutory right; or

(D) without observance of procedure required by law.

(2) Except to the extent that an appeal under this chapter presents a constitutional issue, the Court of Appeals may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.

(e)(1) Upon such review, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have power to affirm or, if the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is not in accordance with law, to modify or reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims or to remand the matter, as appropriate.

(2) Rules for review of decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims shall be those prescribed by the Supreme Court under section 2072 of title 28.

Related references

Browse the M21 manual library

Ready to review your own document? Start your free claim review.