Skip to main content
Menu
Pathfinder builds your claim plan from the records you already have. $500 for the year, full refund for 30 days.See what you get
Questions about plans or prices? The Claim Raven AI assistant answers at (877) 806-3795, day or night.Call now

Conditions Cranial Nerve Conditions

Trigeminal Neuralgia and Bell's Palsy VA Rating

Written and reviewed by Landon · Updated October 6, 2026 · Sources listed at the end

VA rates these conditions by the affected cranial nerve and the loss of function. The fifth nerve scale reaches 50 percent, the seventh reaches 30 percent, and special rules limit neuritis and neuralgia ratings.

Board of Veterans' Appeals: 22.9% granted across 1,650 decided Board rulings on Cranial Nerve Conditions, 2021 to 2026. What this number means

Ask Raven about Cranial Nerve Conditions

Answers grounded in VA rules and Board decisions. Free to start.

How VA rates Cranial Nerve Conditions

DC 8207: Facial Nerve Paralysis (Bell's Palsy)

DC 8207 rating criteria and monthly pay
RatingWhat VA looks forMonthly pay (2026, veteran alone)Calculator
10%Incomplete, moderate paralysis of the seventh (facial) cranial nerve$180.42Try it
20%Incomplete, severe paralysis of the seventh (facial) cranial nerve$356.66Try it
30%Complete paralysis of the seventh (facial) cranial nerve$552.47Try it

Dependent upon relative loss of innervation of facial muscles. The cranial nerve ratings are for unilateral involvement; when bilateral, combine but without the bilateral factor.

Monthly pay is the basic amount for a veteran alone at that overall rating. Separate ratings combine under VA rules; the payments do not add together. Combine your ratings in the calculator or read the VA compensation rates (opens in a new tab).

Criteria checked against 38 CFR Part 4 (eCFR) as of 2026-07-01. 38 CFR § 4.124a explained (official text (opens in a new tab)).

On this page
  1. Trigeminal neuralgia and Bell's palsy VA rating criteria
  2. The neuralgia limit and the trigeminal exception
  3. Neuritis uses a different ceiling
  4. Bell's palsy and remaining facial weakness
  5. How much VA pays for cranial nerve conditions
  6. How to prove a cranial nerve condition is service connected
    1. A condition or nerve injury in service
    2. Secondary to a service-connected condition or its treatment
  7. The C&P exam and the Cranial Nerves DBQ
  8. Why VA denies cranial nerve claims
  9. Questions veterans ask about cranial nerve conditions
    1. What is the VA rating for trigeminal neuralgia?
    2. What is the VA rating for Bell's palsy?
    3. Is every neuralgia claim limited to 10 percent?
    4. Can both sides of the face be rated?
    5. Does a past Bell's palsy diagnosis guarantee compensation?
  10. Sources

Facial pain and facial weakness can lead to different VA ratings because they involve different nerve functions. Trigeminal neuralgia involves the fifth cranial nerve. Bell's palsy involves the facial nerve, the seventh. Their rating scales and the rules for paralysis, neuritis and neuralgia need to be read together.

This page covers those rules and the evidence that makes the difference. The Board section below covers the wider cranial nerve condition family, so its appeal patterns are not limited to these two diagnoses.

Trigeminal neuralgia and Bell's palsy VA rating criteria

38 CFR § 4.124a gives the fifth and seventh cranial nerves these paralysis scales:

Rating level, quoted from the scheduleFifth nerve, DC 8205Seventh nerve, DC 8207
"Complete"50%30%
"Incomplete, severe"30%20%
"Incomplete, moderate"10%10%

The fifth nerve note says the evaluation is "Dependent upon relative degree of sensory manifestation or motor loss." The seventh nerve note says it is "Dependent upon relative loss of innervation of facial muscles."

DC 8305 covers fifth nerve neuritis and DC 8405 its neuralgia. DCs 8307 and 8407 do the same for the seventh nerve. The DC 8207 guide gives the seventh nerve scale separately.

These words do not create a point checklist for every symptom. The examiner needs to describe sensation, movement and functional loss so VA can explain why the impairment is moderate, severe or complete. Section 4.31 allows 0 percent when the compensable requirements are not met and the code has no zero row.

The neuralgia limit and the trigeminal exception

38 CFR § 4.124 says cranial or peripheral neuralgia is rated on the affected nerve's scale, "with a maximum equal to moderate incomplete paralysis." But its last sentence makes an exception:

Tic douloureux, or trifacial neuralgia, may be rated up to complete paralysis of the affected nerve.

The note following DC 8405 repeats that tic douloureux may be rated according to severity, up to complete paralysis. That is why the ordinary neuralgia ceiling does not settle every trigeminal neuralgia claim. The fifth nerve scale permits an evaluation up to 50 percent under this exception when the evidence supports the severity; the diagnosis alone does not automatically establish the top level.

Lambru and colleagues' clinical review describes trigeminal neuralgia as recurrent, brief episodes of severe electric shock-like facial pain and discusses imaging as part of the diagnostic work-up (2021). For a claim, keep the neurological diagnosis, relevant imaging interpretation and a description of the attacks. Explain frequency, duration, affected side and effects on speaking, eating or other activities without trying to select the rating yourself.

Neuritis uses a different ceiling

Section 4.123 describes neuritis with loss of reflexes, muscle atrophy, sensory disturbances and constant pain. It limits the rating to severe incomplete paralysis. Without the organic changes described in the rule, the maximum for a cranial nerve is moderate incomplete paralysis.

That means the applicable code and documented findings matter. A decision should not apply the neuralgia limit to a paralysis claim without explaining the diagnosis. Conversely, calling pain severe does not by itself establish every finding required for a higher neuritis evaluation.

Bell's palsy and remaining facial weakness

The Bell's palsy clinical practice guideline stresses ruling out other identifiable causes of acute facial weakness or paralysis and following patients with incomplete recovery or worsening findings (Baugh and colleagues, 2013). A past episode and the current residuals are separate pieces of your claim.

For the seventh nerve rating, document what facial muscles can and cannot do, which side is affected and what remains after treatment. Keep follow-up examinations as well as the initial diagnosis. The guideline specifically addresses impaired eye closure, so report that problem to your clinician and include any related eye findings in your claim records.

The opening cranial nerve note in § 4.124a says ratings are for unilateral involvement. When both sides are involved, VA combines the evaluations "without the bilateral factor." It also directs smell, taste and vision impairment to the appropriate special-sense codes. Section 4.14 still prevents duplicate evaluations of the same manifestation.

How much VA pays for cranial nerve conditions

At VA's rates effective December 1, 2025, a veteran without dependents receives $180.42 a month at 10 percent, $356.66 at 20 percent, $552.47 at 30 percent and $1,132.90 at 50 percent. Use the combined rating calculator for ordinary combined percentages. Two separate ratings are not simply added together.

How to prove a cranial nerve condition is service connected

A condition or nerve injury in service

Under 38 CFR § 3.303, gather the current diagnosis, evidence of the illness or injury in service and the medical explanation linking them. Useful records may include the initial neurological examination, treatment notes, injury or operative reports and later findings. A diagnosis after discharge can still qualify when the evidence establishes that the disease was incurred in service.

Secondary to a service-connected condition or its treatment

Section 3.310 covers a disability caused or aggravated by a service-connected condition. If the clinician attributes a cranial nerve problem to another condition or its treatment, the opinion should explain that relationship using your records. A shared time of onset alone is not a medical explanation.

The opinion should address whether the nerve condition was aggravated by the veteran's service-connected condition, meaning it would be less severe but for that condition. El-Amin v. Shinseki addresses inadequate consideration of claimed aggravation. For aggravation, § 3.310(b) also calls for evidence establishing baseline severity.

The C&P exam and the Cranial Nerves DBQ

Use the Cranial Nerves DBQ guide as you prepare.

  • Identify the nerve and side. Fifth and seventh nerve codes have different scales.
  • Bring the diagnosis. Distinguish neuralgia, neuritis and paralysis where your clinician has done so.
  • Describe attacks and lasting deficits. Record pain episodes separately from persistent numbness or weakness.
  • Bring follow-up findings. The examination should address current function as well as the original episode.
  • Document separate sensory problems. Include eye, smell or taste findings when present and medically evaluated.

Raven Scan can help you review the uploaded medical records you plan to use in preparing for the exam.

Why VA denies cranial nerve claims

The Board section below shows the available cranial nerve appeal results, including reasons for remand when the data supports that breakdown. It does not currently include a detailed denial breakdown. The evidence issues below follow from the rules described above.

The current diagnosis or residual is unclear. Submit follow-up findings rather than only the record of a past episode.

The link to service is unsupported. Ask the medical opinion to address the particular injury, illness or service-connected condition involved.

The wrong limit was applied. Check whether the decision distinguishes ordinary neuralgia from the tic douloureux exception and from neuritis or paralysis.

The severity findings are incomplete. Statements about facial pain alone may not describe motor loss, sensation, side or the effects on daily function. Those gaps need evidence, rather than a claim that every painful nerve condition merits the maximum.

Questions veterans ask about cranial nerve conditions

What is the VA rating for trigeminal neuralgia?

The fifth nerve paralysis scale has 10, 30 and 50 percent levels. The tic douloureux exception allows rating up to complete paralysis according to severity, rather than applying the ordinary neuralgia ceiling automatically.

What is the VA rating for Bell's palsy?

DC 8207 lists 10 percent for moderate incomplete paralysis, 20 percent for severe incomplete paralysis and 30 percent for complete paralysis. The rating depends on the residual loss of facial muscle innervation and function.

Is every neuralgia claim limited to 10 percent?

No. Ordinary neuralgia is limited to moderate incomplete paralysis on the affected nerve's scale. Section 4.124 specifically excepts tic douloureux or trifacial neuralgia from that ceiling.

Can both sides of the face be rated?

The cranial nerve note allows bilateral involvement to be combined. It specifically says not to apply the bilateral factor to those evaluations.

Does a past Bell's palsy diagnosis guarantee compensation?

No. Service connection and the current or claim-period disability must be established, and the rating must reflect the applicable severity findings. Keep the original diagnosis and the follow-up record showing what remained.

Sources

What Board appeals show for Cranial Nerve Conditions

These are outcomes at the Board of Veterans' Appeals, not first-time claims, and not your personal odds. They show where appeals on this issue tend to land.

How appeals on this issue ended

22.9%

granted across 1,650 decided Board rulings on Cranial Nerve Conditions, 2021 to 2026.

  • Granted378 22.9%
  • Denied621 37.6%
  • Sent back651 39.5%

"Sent back" means remanded: the Board returned the claim to VA for more work instead of deciding it.

The full evidence breakdown

Grant rates for every evidence type and language from actual Board decisions for Cranial Nerve Conditions are in Raven Insights, included with every paid plan.

Why the Board denied cranial nerve conditions claims

In 128 service connection rulings the Board denied, 2021 to 2026, it found this part of the claim not shown:

  • A current diagnosis54.7%
  • A link between cranial nerve conditions and service (nexus)45.3%
  • An event, injury or exposure in service35.2%

A denial can fail more than one part, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.

Why the Board sent cranial nerve conditions claims back

Of 651 cranial nerve conditions rulings the Board remanded, 2021 to 2026:

  • The VA exam or opinion was not adequate47.2%
  • VA still had records to get33.0%
  • VA had not given an exam19.0%
  • The exam was out of date or the condition had worsened7.5%

A remand can ask for records and a new exam at once, so these overlap.

What happened after a remand

Legacy appeals the Board remanded and then decided again on the same docket, with the second decision in 2010 to 2026.

  • Granted when the Board decided it again19.4% of 443

Associations, not causes. Appeals under the 2019 system start a new docket each time, so they cannot be followed this way.

Results by what the appeal asked for

Board rulings on cranial nerve conditions, 2021 to 2026, by the question the Board decided. The share is granted out of every decided ruling, remands included.

  • A higher rating22.4% of 751
  • Service connection16.8% of 558
  • An earlier effective date40.4% of 225

Direct, secondary and presumptive claims

Service connection rulings on cranial nerve conditions, 2021 to 2026, by how the claim was argued. The share is granted out of every decided ruling, remands included.

  • Direct: it began in service16.7% of 329
  • Secondary: caused or worsened by a service-connected condition17.0% of 229
  • Presumptive: the law presumes the link20.7% of 121

All cranial nerve conditions service connection rulings: 16.8% of 558.

A presumptive claim is also counted as direct or secondary.

Rating appeals by diagnostic code

Appeals over the rating itself (a higher rating, a reduction or severance), 2021 to 2026, by the code VA rated under. The share is granted.

How cranial nerve conditions appeals have gone since 1992

Every Board ruling on cranial nerve conditions since 1992, by when it was decided. The share is granted out of every decided ruling.

  • 1992 to 20027.7% of 376
  • 2003 to February 201912.2% of 945
  • February 2019 to August 2022 (new appeals system)15.7% of 604
  • Since August 2022 (PACT Act)27.9% of 876

These rows come from a simpler reading of every decision's order since 1992, so they are a different measure from the 2021 to 2026 figures elsewhere on this page. Issues with unclear outcomes, or with both a decision and a remand, are left out.

Your next step

Get one VA document reviewed free

Upload a decision letter, medical record, exam report or statement. You get findings, source references and suggested next steps.

One free review per verified email. No credit card needed.

Write your personal statement

Describe your symptoms and daily impact, then download your statement. No account required.

Open the free builder

Ask Raven about Cranial Nerve Conditions

Ask specific questions about your cranial nerve conditions claim and get answers grounded in Board decisions.

Ask a question

Have a VA decision letter? Raven Eye explains it in plain English. Have your VA medical records? Raven Scan looks for conditions you have not claimed.

Grant rates reflect Board outcomes on appealed claims, not initial-claim outcomes. Claim Raven is not legal or medical advice and is not affiliated with the VA.

Veterans Crisis Line: dial 988, then press 1