What this means
m21-1:V.i.1.C explains pre-rating review of claims by the rating activity. In plain terms, the official guidance says the rating activity must review cases routed for a rating decision to confirm that the claimed issues require a rating decision in accordance with M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.A.1.b. It also addresses the decision maker is responsible for ensuring that the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) duty to notify has been satisfied before proceeding to a decision.
How this may help with a claim
Use m21-1:V.i.1.C when organizing evidence or checking VA's handling of pre-rating review of claims by the rating activity. Compare your application, supporting records, and notice with this source-specific point: The rating activity must review cases routed for a rating decision to confirm that the claimed issues require a rating decision in accordance with M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.A.1.b. The decision maker is responsible for ensuring that the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) duty to notify has been satisfied before proceeding to a decision. Save proof of submission and identify the exact condition, exception, or missing development step before requesting correction or choosing a review option.
What to review in your file
- Check the file against this official condition: The rating activity must review cases routed for a rating decision to confirm that the claimed issues require a rating decision in accordance with M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.A.1.b.
- Confirm that the record or notice addresses this source point: Before issuing a rating decision, the rating activity must also ensure that any needed administrative decisions, such as a line-of-duty determination, have been completed and authorized.
- Document how this stated step or exception applies: The decision maker is responsible for ensuring that the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) duty to notify has been satisfied before proceeding to a decision.
Important limits
m21-1:V.i.1.C explains VA guidance for pre-rating review of claims by the rating activity; it does not guarantee an award or replace the statutes, regulations, binding decisions, and review instructions that control an individual claim. Conditions and exceptions still matter, including this source point: The rating activity must review cases routed for a rating decision to confirm that the claimed issues require a rating decision in accordance with M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.A.1.b. Refer a claim to the authorization activity for an administrative denial of benefits when the claimed entitlement is unsupported by law.
Search terms when useful
Phrases that may help when searching your claim file or this library.
- Pre-Rating Review of Claims by the Rating Activity
- m21-1:V.i.1.C
- Pre-Rating Review Claims
- Rating Activity
- Confirming Rating Activity Jurisdiction
- V.i.1.C.1.a. Pre-Rating Review Confirm
- rating activity must review
- Before issuing rating decision
Original VA guidance
The official VA text of this section
Overview
In This Section
This section contains the following topics:
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| Topic | Topic Name |
|---|---|
| 1 | Confirming Rating Activity Jurisdiction |
| 2 | Reviewing for Compliance With the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) Duty to Notify and Assist |
| 3 | Handling Claims Unsupported by Law |
1. Confirming Rating Activity Jurisdiction
Change Date
May 15, 2017
V.i.1.C.1.a. Pre-Rating Review to Confirm Rating Activity Jurisdiction
The rating activity must review cases routed for a rating decision to confirm that the claimed issues require a rating decision in accordance with M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.A.1.b.
Before issuing a rating decision, the rating activity must also ensure that any needed administrative decisions, such as a line-of-duty determination, have been completed and authorized.
References: For more information on
- the rating activity generally, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.A
- referrals to the rating activity, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.B
- determining the issues, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 3.A
- partial rating decisions and deferred issues, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 3.B
- administrative decisions, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart v, 1.C, and
- establishing Veteran status, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 1.A.
2. Reviewing for Compliance With VA’s Duty to Notify and Assist
Introduction
This topic contains information on considering VA’s duty to notify and assist, including
- duty to notify review by the rating activity, and
- duty to assist review by the rating activity.
Change Date
November 17, 2025
V.i.1.C.2.a. Duty to Notify Review by the Rating Activity
The decision maker is responsible for ensuring that the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) duty to notify has been satisfied before proceeding to a decision. Use the table below to review the evidence of record and ensure VA’s duty to notify requirements have been met.
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| If … | Then review … |
|---|---|
| VA receives a claim on the prescribed form | the form to ensure it is substantially complete, and the claim to ensure it is not inherently incredible or lacking merit. References: For more information on substantially complete application, see M21-1, Part I, Subpart i, 1.A.4.f M21-1, Part II, Subpart iii, 1.C, and 38 CFR 3.159(a)(3), and action required on claims that are inherently incredible or lack merit, see M21-1, Part I, Subpart i, 1.A.4.c, and M21-1, Part II, Subpart iii, 1.C.2.f. |
| the form is substantially complete | to determine whether Section 5103 notice requirements have been met under the guidance in M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.B. References: For more information on notification requirements for a complete application, see M21-1, Part II, Subpart iii, 1.C.2.a when the duty to notify has already been provided on the application form or through filing, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.B.1.b circumstances where a Section 5103 notice may need to be provided after a claim is submitted, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.B.1.c, and exceptions to the Section 5103 notice requirement, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.B.1.d. |
| VA becomes aware of the existence of relevant records before the claim is decided | the claims folder to ensure that VA has notified the claimant of the relevant records of the need for a release of records (if applicable), and to obtain the records and provide them to VA if the claimant does not provide the necessary release. |
| evidence requested by VA from a third party does not exist or cannot be obtained | the claims folder to ensure that VA has identified the records that could not be obtained explained the efforts VA made to obtain the records described any further action VA will take regarding the claim, including, but not limited to notice that VA will decide the claim based on the evidence of record unless the claimant submits the records VA was unable to obtain, and indicated that the claimant is ultimately responsible for providing the evidence. Note: For non-Federal records requests, VA may provide the notice at the same time it makes a follow-up attempt to obtain the relevant records. |
| a proposed adverse action is referred for final decision | the notice of proposed adverse action to ensure all the elements of due process have been met. References: For more information on due process, see M21-1, Part I, Subpart i, 1.B, and the notice of proposed adverse action, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 3.A. |
References: For more information on
- notifying the claimant of necessary information or evidence, see 38 CFR 3.159(b)
- notifying the claimant when records cannot be obtained, see
- 38 CFR 3.159(e), and
- M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.C.3, and
- ensuring that notification has been sent through the Centralized Benefits Communications Management (CBCM) program, see
- M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.C.4.c, and
- the Talent Management System (TMS) course titled Centralized Benefits Communications Management (VA 4562424).
V.i.1.C.2.b. Duty to Assist Review by the Rating Activity
The decision maker is responsible for ensuring that the duty to assist has been satisfied before proceeding to a decision. Use the table below to review the evidence of record and ensure VA’s duty to assist requirements have been met.
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| If the information or evidence is … | Then ensure VA … |
|---|---|
| needed in support of a benefit-specific or special-issue claim type (for example, individual unemployability or service connection for hepatitis) | notified the claimant of any additional forms or special-issue evidence needed to support the claim how the forms/evidence can be obtained/presented, and when the forms/evidence must be received. Reference: For more information on notification requirements for special issues, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.B.1.f. |
| requested from Federal agencies | received complete records, or if the records were not obtained, determined that they do not exist or additional efforts would be futile. Reference: For more information on duty to assist with Federal records, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart ii, 1.A.1.a, and 38 CFR 3.159(c)(2). |
| requested from the claimant and/or private providers | received complete records, or if the records are not received, made reasonable efforts to obtain them. References: For more information on reasonable efforts to obtain non-Federal records, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.C.2, and 38 CFR 3.159(c)(1), and claimants' cooperation with the duty to assist in obtaining non-Federal records, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.C.2.c, and 38 CFR 3.159(c)(1)(i). |
| VA medical records | obtained all VA medical records pertinent to the issues, and associated them with the electronic claims folder. Note: Vet Center records require the Veteran’s authorization to release records and are not stored in the Compensation and Pension Record Interchange (CAPRI). References: For more information on obtaining VA medical records, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart ii, 1.A.2 storing records from CAPRI, see the CAPRI User Manual, and obtaining records from a Vet Center, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart ii, 1.A.1.e. |
| an examination request | requested all examinations and medical opinions, when required, and included the correct information to the examiner in the request(s). Reference: For more information on VA’s duty to provide medical examinations or medical opinions, see M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 1.A, and 38 CFR 3.159(c)(4). |
| an examination report | received a complete examination report that is sufficient for rating purposes, or received notice that the claimant failed to report. References: For more information on reviewing examination reports for sufficiency, see M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 3.A and B, and failure to report for scheduled examinations, see 38 CFR 3.655 M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 2.F, and M21-1, Part IV, Subpart ii, 2.B. |
References: For more information on
- circumstances where VA will refrain from or discontinue providing assistance, see 38 CFR 3.159(d), and
- ensuring that notification has been sent through the CBCM program, see
- M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.C.4.c, and
- the TMS course titled Centralized Benefits Communications Management (VA 4562424).
3. Handling Claims Unsupported by Law
Introduction
This topic contains information on handling claims unsupported by law, including
- referring to the authorization activity claims that are unsupported by law, and
- dismissing claims unsupported by law.
Change Date
April 9, 2018
V.i.1.C.3.a. Referring to the Authorization Activity Claims That Are Unsupported by Law
Refer a claim to the authorization activity for an administrative denial of benefits when the claimed entitlement is unsupported by law.
Example: Such claims include pension claims from Veterans with only peacetime service.
Reference: For more information on conditions under which the authorization activity may deny a claim, see M21-1, Part VI, Subpart i, 1.A.3.b and c.
V.i.1.C.3.b. Dismissing Claims Unsupported by Law
When a claim is unsupported by law, the claim
- should be dismissed as a result of the lack of legal merit
- does not require any development action, and
- does not require a rating decision.
Note: The claim must clearly be unsupported by law to be dismissed.