What this means
m21-1:VIII.iii.6.B explains rating claims based on participation in project shipboard hazard and defense (shad). In plain terms, the official guidance says from December 1962 to May 1974, the Department of War (DOW) conducted the Shipboard Hazard and Defense (SHAD) Project to identify the vulnerabilities of U.S. warships to chemical and biological warfare agents. It also addresses the determination of whether to award service connection (SC) for a disease or injury claimed as related to participation in Project SHAD is not limited to an evaluation on that basis.
How this may help with a claim
Use m21-1:VIII.iii.6.B when organizing evidence or checking VA's handling of rating claims based on participation in project shipboard hazard and defense (shad). Compare your application, supporting records, and notice with this source-specific point: From December 1962 to May 1974, the Department of War (DOW) conducted the Shipboard Hazard and Defense (SHAD) Project to identify the vulnerabilities of U.S. The determination of whether to award service connection (SC) for a disease or injury claimed as related to participation in Project SHAD is not limited to an evaluation on that basis. Save proof of submission and identify the exact condition, exception, or missing development step before requesting correction or choosing a review option.
What to review in your file
- Check the file against this official condition: In addition to the general rating narrative requirements outlined in M21-1, Part V, Subpart iv, 1.A, SHAD rating decisions must follow the below guidelines.
- Confirm that the record or notice addresses this source point: Since SHAD is considered TERA participation, the rating decision must follow the TERA rating guidance outlined in the PACT Act Implementation SOP.
- Document how this stated step or exception applies: When denying SC because an explicit allegation of SHAD participation could not be established, the rating decision must include the following free text:
Important limits
m21-1:VIII.iii.6.B explains VA guidance for rating claims based on participation in project shipboard hazard and defense (shad); it does not guarantee an award or replace the statutes, regulations, binding decisions, and review instructions that control an individual claim. Conditions and exceptions still matter, including this source point: From December 1962 to May 1974, the Department of War (DOW) conducted the Shipboard Hazard and Defense (SHAD) Project to identify the vulnerabilities of U.S. In addition to the general rating narrative requirements outlined in M21-1, Part V, Subpart iv, 1.A, SHAD rating decisions must follow the below guidelines.
Search terms when useful
Phrases that may help when searching your claim file or this library.
- Rating Claims Based on Participation in Project Shipboard Hazard and Defense (SHAD)
- m21-1:VIII.iii.6.B
- Rating Claims Based
- Participation Project Shipboard
- This Section This section
- Rating Claims Based Participation
- background Project SHAD
- considering service connection based
Original VA guidance
The official VA text of this section
Overview
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| In This Section | This section contains the topic “ Rating Claims Based on Participation in Project SHAD.” |
1. Rating Claims Based on Participation in Project SHAD
Introduction
This topic contains information on claims based on participation in Project SHAD, including
- background on Project SHAD
- considering service connection (SC) based on SHAD participation, and
- Project SHAD rating requirements.
Change Date
March 17, 2025
VIII.iii.6.B.1.a. Background on Project SHAD
From December 1962 to May 1974, the Department of War (DOW) conducted the Shipboard Hazard and Defense (SHAD) Project to identify the vulnerabilities of U.S. warships to chemical and biological warfare agents.
Reference: For more information on development and other considerations for claims based on participation in Project SHAD, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, 6.A.
VIII.iii.6.B.1.b. Considering SC Based on SHAD Participation
The determination of whether to award service connection (SC) for a disease or injury claimed as related to participation in Project SHAD is not limited to an evaluation on that basis. Decisions to award or deny SC should also consider all exposures the Veteran incurred in all documented toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) participation, to include SHAD testing.
Note: There are no presumptive conditions or disabilities recognized as common to Project SHAD. DOW used more than 140 agents in testing with differing durations, dosage, and methods of exposure, and noted that an Institute of Medicine study conducted between the years of 1982 and 1985 found no significant long-term health effects in participants.
References: For more information on
- requesting medical opinions for SHAD participants, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, 6.A.2.c, and
- processing TERA claims, see the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act of 2022 Implementation Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
VIII.iii.6.B.1.c. Project SHAD Rating Requirements
In addition to the general rating narrative requirements outlined in M21-1, Part V, Subpart iv, 1.A, SHAD rating decisions must follow the below guidelines.
- Since SHAD is considered TERA participation, the rating decision must follow the TERA rating guidance outlined in the PACT Act Implementation SOP.
- When denying SC because an explicit allegation of SHAD participation could not be established, the rating decision must include the following free text:
You reported exposure to Shipboard Hazard and Defense (SHAD) testing, also known as Project SHAD or Project 112. From 1962 to 1974, the Department of War (DOW) conducted Project SHAD to determine the potential risks to U.S. warships and American forces from chemical and biological warfare agents. The evidence of record does not show you participated in SHAD testing.
- When completing the SUBJECT field on the ISSUE MANAGEMENT tab in Veterans Benefits Management System – Rating (VBMS-R), end the description of the disability with [SHAD] regardless of whether the issue is being awarded or denied. This will clearly identify the SHAD Project claimed issues, or those issues which the decision maker has decided are related to the Project 112/SHAD Project, on the Codesheet.
Example: Scar, right upper extremity [SHAD].
Reference: For more information on entering decisions in VBMS-R, see the VBMS Rating User Guide.