What this means
m21-1:X.iv.3.A explains fraud and laboratory analysis of evidence. In plain terms, the official guidance says fraud occurs when facts are intentionally misrepresented or withheld in the interest of obtaining or retaining VA benefits. It also addresses follow the steps in the table below after making a preliminary decision that a fraudulent act might have occurred.
How this may help with a claim
Use m21-1:X.iv.3.A when organizing evidence or checking VA's handling of fraud and laboratory analysis of evidence. Compare your application, supporting records, and notice with this source-specific point: Fraud occurs when facts are intentionally misrepresented or withheld in the interest of obtaining or retaining VA benefits. Follow the steps in the table below after making a preliminary decision that a fraudulent act might have occurred. Save proof of submission and identify the exact condition, exception, or missing development step before requesting correction or choosing a review option.
What to review in your file
- Check the file against this official condition: Fraud occurs when facts are intentionally misrepresented or withheld in the interest of obtaining or retaining VA benefits.
- Confirm that the record or notice addresses this source point: Type of Fraudulent Act — Description; commission — Occurs when an individual knowingly makes or causes to be made, conspires, combines, aids, or assists in, agrees to, arranges for, or in any way procures the making or presentation of a false or fraudulent certificate, statement, voucher, or paper concerning any claim.;
- Document how this stated step or exception applies: commission — Occurs when an individual knowingly makes or causes to be made, conspires, combines, aids, or assists in, agrees to, arranges for, or in any way procures the making or presentation of a false or fraudulent certificate, statement, voucher, or paper concerning any claim.
Important limits
m21-1:X.iv.3.A explains VA guidance for fraud and laboratory analysis of evidence; it does not guarantee an award or replace the statutes, regulations, binding decisions, and review instructions that control an individual claim. Conditions and exceptions still matter, including this source point: Fraud occurs when facts are intentionally misrepresented or withheld in the interest of obtaining or retaining VA benefits. We found evidence that you may have been the victim of fraud. Fraud occurs when an individual knowingly makes a presentation of false information to wrongfully obtain your VA benefits.
Search terms when useful
Phrases that may help when searching your claim file or this library.
- Fraud and Laboratory Analysis of Evidence
- m21-1:X.iv.3.A
- Fraud Laboratory Analysis
- Evidence
- Allegations Fraud
- definition fraud
- policy disclosing cases fraud.
- X.iv.3.A.1.a. Definition Fraud
Original VA guidance
The official VA text of this section
Overview
In This Section
This section contains the following topics:
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| Topic | Topic Name |
|---|---|
| 1 | General Information on Allegations of Fraud |
| 2 | Handling Cases of Fraud |
| 3 | Office of Inspector General (OIG) Regional Field Offices |
| 4 | Potential Fraud Against a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Claimant |
| 5 | Requesting Laboratory Analysis of Evidence |
1. General Information on Allegations of Fraud
Introduction
This topic contains general information on allegations of fraud, including
- definition of fraud, and
- policy for disclosing information on cases of fraud.
Change Date
July 25, 2018
X.iv.3.A.1.a. Definition: Fraud
Fraud occurs when facts are intentionally misrepresented or withheld in the interest of obtaining or retaining Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.
The table below describes types of fraudulent acts.
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| Type of Fraudulent Act | Description |
|---|---|
| commission | Occurs when an individual knowingly makes or causes to be made, conspires, combines, aids, or assists in, agrees to, arranges for, or in any way procures the making or presentation of a false or fraudulent certificate, statement, voucher, or paper concerning any claim. |
| omission | Occurs when an individual who is entitled to or receiving benefits fails to provide information and all of the bullets below are true. The individual has knowledge of the facts on which eligibility for or entitlement to the benefits is based. The individual had knowledge of a change in circumstances and knew that such change could affect entitlement or eligibility. The individual chose not to notify VA of the change in circumstances with the actual intention of receiving or obtaining benefit payments, or retaining increased benefit payments. The individual received or retained benefit payments or increased benefit payments as a result of the intentional failure to disclose the change in circumstances. |
Reference: For more information on the definition of fraud, see
- 38 CFR 3.901
- 38 CFR 3.1(aa), and
- 38 U.S.C. 6103.
X.iv.3.A.1.b. Policy for Disclosing Information on Cases of Fraud
Limit the sharing of information regarding allegations and referrals of cases of fraud to those individuals having a need to know. Secure pertinent records to prevent tampering or loss.
2. Handling Cases of Fraud
Introduction
This topic contains information on handling cases of fraud, including
- types of cases to refer to OIG
- procedure for handling cases in which a fraudulent act might have occurred
- referring a case of fraud to OIG, and
- cases of fraud involving Central Office (CO) or regional office (RO) employees.
Change Date
April 9, 2025
X.iv.3.A.2.a. Types of Cases to Refer to OIG
In certain areas, local Office of Inspector General (OIG) regional field offices provide locally-determined guidelines to VA regional offices (ROs) in their jurisdiction for referring cases of fraud.
If there are no locally-determined guidelines, refer all cases of fraud to OIG.
Exception: U nless local agreements specify, do not refer cases in which the
- overpayment attributable to fraud is less than $10,000, or
- initial act of alleged fraud was committed more than five years prior to the current date.
Reference: For more information on OIG regional field offices, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A.3.
X.iv.3.A.2.b. Procedure for Handling Cases in Which a Fraudulent Act Might Have Occurred
Follow the steps in the table below after making a preliminary decision that a fraudulent act might have occurred.
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Prepare a notice of proposed adverse action that notifies the beneficiary or fiduciary of the proposed adjustment, including the revised rates, and dates of payment the reason for the adjustment his/her right to present evidence to rebut the evidence serving as the basis for the proposed adjustment the 60-day period, which begins on the date of the notice, for submitting evidence to show why the adjustment should not be made his/her right to representation and a personal hearing, and the fact that if VA receives a request for a hearing within 30 days of the date of the notice, VA will continue paying benefits at the present rate until the hearing is held and the testimony is reviewed. Important: Avoid any mention of fraud in the notice of proposed adverse action. Note: Provide a copy of the notice of proposed adverse action to the OIG regional field office with jurisdiction over the RO that prepared the notice. References: For more information on preparing a notice of proposed adverse action, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 3.A, and the jurisdiction of OIG regional field offices, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A.3. |
| 2 | Establish a suspense date that is 65 days from the date of the notice of proposed adverse action. |
| 3 | Did VA receive evidence within the 65-day period that would change the decision to adjust the beneficiary’s award? If yes, make any necessary adjustments to restore the award to its original state, and take no further action. If no, go to the next step. |
| 4 | Amend the award for the appropriate periods effective the beginning date of the award or the day preceding the date of the fraudulent act, whichever is later, per 38 CFR 3.500(k). Note: Use the reason Fraud for each award adjustment resulting from fraud. Reference: For more information on adjusting an award for a fraudulent act, see the Veterans Benefits Management System Awards User Guide. |
| 5 | Is referral of the case to OIG appropriate, according to the instructions in M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A.2.a? If yes, go to Step 8. If no, go to the next step. |
| 6 | Send to the beneficiary or fiduciary a decision notice that meets the requirements set forth in M21-1, Part VI, Subpart i, 1.B. |
| 7 | Does the fraud case involve foreign residency or domicile as discussed in M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.B.1.c? If yes, disregard the remaining steps in this table, and follow the instructions in M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.B. If no, take no further action. |
| 8 | Does the fraud case involve foreign residency or domicile as discussed in M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.B.1.b? If yes, complete the remaining steps in this table while concurrently following the instructions in M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.B. If no, go to the next step. |
| 9 | After authorizing the award adjustment referenced in Step 4, send to the finance activity an encrypted e-mail that requests postponement of any collection action cites M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3, as the basis for the request, and provides the following information: file number payee number beneficiary’s name, and date of the award adjustment. Note: The beneficiary or fiduciary retains all rights, including the right to request a waiver of any overpayment which may result from the adjustment. |
| 10 | Select and append the OIG Case corporate flash in Share. Add the following system note: Fraud referral to OIG. Coordinate with OIG if waiver request is received. Reference: For more information on selecting and appending corporate flashes in Share, see the Share User Guide. |
| 11 | Send to the beneficiary or fiduciary a decision notice that meets the requirements set forth in M21-1, Part VI, Subpart i, 1.B. Important: In the decision notice, do not reference the right to request a waiver, or discuss collection of any debt arising from the adjustment. |
| 12 | Refer the case to OIG, citing beneficiary or fiduciary fraud under 38 CFR 3.901 or 38 U.S.C. 6102. Important: Refer cases to OIG only after completing development and making any necessary award adjustments. Pension management centers (PMCs) must e-mail a copy of their OIG referral to the Fraud Incident Team at VAVBAWAS/CO/FRAUDINCEDENTTEAM, and include the words OIG Referral in the e-mail subject line. Reference: For more information on referring cases of fraud to OIG, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A.2.c. |
| 13 | Establish end product (EP) 330 with a suspense date that is the first workday following a 60-day period that begins on the date of authorization of the award adjustment. Add Request for Special Report as a tracked item. After the suspense date passes, check the status of the OIG referral. |
| 14 | Did OIG respond within the 60-day suspense period? If yes, upload the response to the beneficiary’s electronic claims folder, and go to the next step. If no, assume OIG will not pursue the case instruct the finance activity to start collection action clear the pending EP 330, and disregard the remaining steps in this table. |
| 15 | Did OIG indicate it will pursue the case? If yes, go to the next step. If no, instruct the finance activity to start collection action clear the pending EP 330, and disregard the remaining step in this table. |
| 16 | Refer the claims folder to OIG. Update the suspense date to one that is consistent with OIG’s tentative date for resolution of the case, but not more than six months in the future. Note: If final action is not completed within the six-month period, contact OIG to ensure that control of the case has not been lost update the suspense date, not to exceed six months in the future, and follow up with OIG every six months, updating the suspense date as needed. |
X.iv.3.A.2.c. Referring a Case of Fraud to OIG
The table below describes the stages in the process for referring a case of fraud to OIG.
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| Stage | Who Is Responsible | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | authorization activity | Uses Optional Form 41, Routing and Transmittal Slip, plain bond paper, or a locally-developed fraud referral worksheet or memorandum to summarize the facts of the case, including the identities of individuals involved, as well as possible witnesses a description of the alleged violation or fraudulent activity, including the date, time, and location, if known, and an estimate of the corresponding overpayment. Notes: Referrals should include, if available, the Social Security numbers of individuals involved and possible witnesses. I n the absence of a local agreement to the contrary, do not routinely refer the claims folder to OIG at the time of the initial fraud referral. In unusual situations requiring immediate action, oral referrals may be made; however, these must later be confirmed in writing. In any case involving multiple allegations, make a separate referral for each allegation, with each allegation cross-referenced to the other. (Example: Employee aids a claimant in submitting a fraudulent claim.) |
| 2 | Veterans Service Center Manager, PMC Manager, or designee | Contacts the OIG regional field office with jurisdiction over the RO that is handling the case to make arrangements for OIG to review the case to determine whether investigation and prosecution is warranted. Reference: For more information on determining which OIG regional field office to contact, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A.3.a. |
| 3 | OIG agent | Indicates which documents need to be copied for use by OIG and the U.S. Attorney. |
| 4 | Inspector General | Notifies the RO Director within 60 calendar days as to whether the case will be prosecuted. |
X.iv.3.A.2.d. Cases of Fraud Involving CO or RO Employees
Use the table below to determine where to send additional copies of referrals for cases of fraud involving
- Central Office (CO) employees
- RO employees, or
- fiduciaries.
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| If the case involves a(n) … | Then forward a copy of the referral to … |
|---|---|
| CO employee | General Counsel (02) 810 Vermont Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20420 |
| RO employee, or fiduciary | Office of Field Operations (OFO) (201), and District Counsel (02). Note: OFO may require that copies or summaries of referrals of false statements or claims be forwarded to CO. |
3. OIG Regional Field Offices
Change Date
June 18, 2020
X.iv.3.A.3.a. OIG Regional Field Offices
Use the table below to determine which OIG regional field office to contact to review cases to determine whether investigation and prosecution for fraud is warranted.
Scroll sideways to see the full table.
| Location | Regional Field Office |
|---|---|
| Connecticut Delaware Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire New Jersey New York Eastern Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont | Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigations Division Northeast Field Office 275 Chestnut Street, Room 122 Manchester, NH 03101-2485 Telephone: (603) 222-5866 |
| District of Columbia Maryland North Carolina South Carolina Virginia West Virginia Western Pennsylvania | Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigations Division Mid-Atlantic Field Office P.O. Box 27387 Washington, DC 20038 Telephone: (202) 530-9193 |
| Alabama Florida Georgia Kentucky Tennessee Puerto Rico | Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigations Division Southeast Field Office 7721 North Military Trail, Suite 5 West Palm Beach, FL 33410-6410 Telephone: (561) 422-7720 |
| Colorado Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nebraska North Dakota Ohio South Dakota Wisconsin Wyoming | Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigations Division Central Field Office P.O. Box 1454 Hines, IL 60140 Telephone: (708) 202-2676 |
| Arkansas Louisiana Mississippi Oklahoma Texas | Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigations Division South Central Field Office 6900 Almeda Road, Room 1073 Houston, TX 77030 Telephone: (713) 383-2793 |
| Arizona Southern California Idaho Montana Southern Nevada New Mexico Utah | Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigations Division Western Field Office 5120 Shoreham Place, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92122 Telephone: (858) 404-8332 |
| Alaska Eastern California Central California Guam Hawaii Idaho Montana Northern Nevada Oregon Philippines Washington | Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigations Division Northwest Field Office 1301 Clay Street, Room 1610N Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 637-6360 |
4. Potential Fraud Against a VA Claimant
Introduction
This topic contains information on potential fraud against a VA claimant, including
- notice requirements, and
- complaints of financial exploitation in pension cases.
Change Date
October 13, 2021
X.iv.3.A.4.a. Notice Requirements
In cases where a claims processor notes the possible existence of fraud against a claimant, notify the claimant using a locally generated letter.
Use the following language:
We found evidence that you may have been the victim of fraud. Fraud occurs when an individual knowingly makes a presentation of false information to wrongfully obtain your VA benefits. To file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission through the Federal Consumer Complaint Center, please visit consumercomplaints.fcc.gov. Additional information on protecting yourself against financial exploitation may be found at https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/financial-exploitation.
X.iv.3.A.4.b. Complaints of Financial Exploitation in Pension Cases
In cases where a claims processor receives a specific complaint alleging a claimant was financially exploited (pension poaching), refer the complaint to Pension and Fiduciary Service, Quality and Oversight Team, at VAVBAWAS/CO/P&F TNG QUAL OVRST.
5. Requesting Laboratory Analysis of Evidence
Change Date
February 26, 2021
X.iv.3.A.5.a. Requesting Laboratory Analysis of Evidence
The Inspector General, Office of Investigation no longer provides laboratory analysis to stations to assist in resolving apparent discrepancies in evidence.
However, a station, through its Support Services Division, may request and obtain contract-based laboratory examination, analysis, identification, and classification of any of the following material:
- handwriting
- typewriting
- fingerprints, and
- document authenticity.
Important: Contract-based laboratory analysis is appropriately requested only when apparent discrepancies in evidence cannot be resolved through existing policies and procedures relating to authenticity of evidence and fraud. Selected provisions are listed below.
References: For more information on
- determining authenticity or acceptability of
- a signature or other mark as part of claim screening, see M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B
- documents used to verify service, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 1.B
- photocopies of public documents and service documents offered in support of a claimant’s statement, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.D.5, and
- examiner signatures and examination reports, see M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 3.A
- evaluation of evidence, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 1.A, and
- fraud, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A.1.