Menu

Regulation · 38 CFR § 20.800

38 CFR 20.800: Board Docket Order and Advancement Requests

§ 20.800 Rule 800. Order of consideration of appeals.

Claim Raven explanation

What this means

Modernized appeals are placed on dockets according to the selected review option and generally considered in docket order. This rule also addresses changes between dockets and qualifying advancement requests.

Advancement requires an applicable reason and supporting facts. It changes priority under the rule, but it does not guarantee a particular completion date or outcome. Legacy docket rules are addressed separately.

How this helps your claim

Verify that the Board recorded the correct docket choice and date. If requesting advancement, submit evidence of the qualifying circumstance and identify the case clearly.

What to check in your records

Use your decision, examination reports, and relevant records to check the following points.

  • Confirm the docket option and recorded docket date.
  • Keep any approved request to move between dockets.
  • Gather the evidence supporting a qualifying advancement request.

Understand docket position and advancement separately

A docket organizes the order of consideration under the selected review option. Advancement is a separate request based on qualifying circumstances. Keep the docket identification and any supporting advancement material distinct from the evidence about entitlement to the benefit.

If the docket changes, read the rule and notice concerning the resulting position. A new selection should not be assumed to preserve every prior scheduling expectation. Likewise, advancement addresses priority; it does not determine whether the evidence supports a grant.

Does advancement guarantee a decision by a particular date?

No. It changes priority under the applicable provisions without promising an individual completion date or outcome. The case can still require review of its issues and record. Avoid treating an approved priority request as either a merits decision or a fixed processing-time commitment.

Put this information to use

See what your claim document supports

Start a free Claim Readiness Review to see what one document supports and what may be missing. Choose your document, then confirm your email to run the review.

One free review per verified email. The review does not predict a rating or guarantee a VA decision. You decide what to file.

Official regulatory text

38 CFR § 20.800

eCFR snapshot: September 3, 2026. Layout and spacing are adapted for reading. The full section and its tables are included below.

§ 20.800 Rule 800. Order of consideration of appeals.

(a) Docketing of appeals.

(1) Applications for review on appeal are docketed in the order in which they are received on the following dockets:

(i) A docket for appeals in which an appellant does not request a hearing or an opportunity to submit additional evidence on the Notice of Disagreement;

(ii) A docket for appeals in which the appellant does not request a hearing but does request an opportunity to submit additional evidence on the Notice of Disagreement; and

(iii) A docket for appeals in which the appellant requests a hearing on the Notice of Disagreement.

(2) An appeal may be moved from one docket to another only when the Notice of Disagreement has been modified pursuant to Rule 202, paragraph (c)(3) (§ 20.202(c)(3)). The request to modify the Notice of Disagreement must reflect that the appellant requests the option listed in § 20.202(b) that corresponds to the docket to which the appeal will be moved. An appeal that is moved from one docket to another will retain its original docket date.

(b) Except as otherwise provided, each appeal will be decided in the order in which it is entered on the docket to which it is assigned.

(c) Advancement on the docket —

(1) Grounds for advancement. A case may be advanced on the docket to which it is assigned on the motion of the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, a party to the case before the Board, or such party's representative. Such a motion may be granted only if the case involves interpretation of law of general application affecting other claims, if the appellant is seriously ill or is under severe financial hardship, or if other sufficient cause is shown. “Other sufficient cause” shall include, but is not limited to, administrative error resulting in a significant delay in docketing the case, administrative necessity, or the advanced age of the appellant. For purposes of this Rule, “advanced age” is defined as 75 or more years of age. This paragraph does not require the Board to advance a case on the docket in the absence of a motion of a party to the case or the party's representative.

(2) Requirements for motions. Motions for advancement on the docket must be in writing and must identify the specific reason(s) why advancement on the docket is sought, the name of the veteran, the name of the appellant if other than the veteran (e.g., a veteran's survivor, a guardian, a substitute appellant, or a fiduciary appointed to receive VA benefits on an individual's behalf), and the applicable Department of Veterans Affairs file number. The motion must be filed with the Board of Veterans' Appeals, P.O. Box 27063, Washington, DC 20038.

(3) Disposition of motions. If a motion is received prior to the assignment of the case to an individual Member or panel of Members, the ruling on the motion will be by the Vice Chairman, who may delegate such authority to a Deputy Vice Chairman. If a motion to advance a case on the docket is denied, the appellant and his or her representative will be immediately notified. If the motion to advance a case on the docket is granted, that fact will be noted in the Board's decision when rendered.

(d) Consideration of appeals remanded by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. A case remanded by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for appropriate action will be treated expeditiously by the Board without regard to its place on the Board's docket.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7112; Sec. 302,103-446; 108 Stat. 4645)

(e) Case remanded to correct duty to assist error and new Notice of Disagreement filed after readjudication. A case will not be returned to the Board following the agency of original jurisdiction's readjudication of an appeal previously remanded by the Board pursuant to Rule 802, paragraph (c) (§ 20.802(c)), unless the claimant files a new Notice of Disagreement. Such cases will be docketed in the order in which the most recent Notice of Disagreement was received.

(f) Cases involving substitution. A case returned to the Board following the grant of a substitution request or pursuant to an appeal of a denial of a substitution request assumes the same place on the docket held by the deceased appellant at the time of his or her death. If the deceased appellant's case was advanced on the docket prior to his or her death pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, the substitute will receive the benefit of the advanced placement.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5121A)

(g) Postponement to provide hearing. Any other provision of this Rule notwithstanding, a case may be postponed for later consideration and determination if such postponement is necessary to afford the appellant a hearing.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105, 7107)

[84 FR 188, Jan. 18, 2019; 84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]

Related references

Browse the M21 manual library

Ready to review your own document? Start your free claim review.