Menu

Regulation · 38 CFR § 3.156

38 CFR 3.156: New evidence, legacy claims, and service records

§ 3.156 New evidence.

Claim Raven explanation

What this means

This section defines new evidence and contains provisions for legacy reopening, evidence received during specified periods, and later-associated official service department records. Those are distinct situations within one reference.

Modern supplemental claims use the new-and-relevant standard in § 3.2501, rather than simply importing the legacy new-and-material test. Relevant service department records can raise a separate reconsideration question under paragraph (c).

How this helps your claim

This helps you identify which evidence rule belongs to your procedural situation. Compare the prior decision, when VA received the evidence, and what kind of records became available.

What to check in your records

Use your decision, examination reports, and relevant records to check the following points.

  • Identify whether the matter is legacy reopening, a supplemental claim, or reconsideration based on service records.
  • Keep receipt dates and the earlier decision's evidence list.
  • Determine which records were previously unavailable and what disputed fact they address.

Identify why the additional evidence matters

A later medical report, evidence received while a matter remains pending and newly associated service department records can lead to different procedural questions. The date VA received an item and the kind of record it is can be as important as what it says.

For service department records, identify the specific document and whether it addresses a relevant fact from the earlier decision. Keep the earlier evidence list for comparison. Finding a document later does not automatically establish that every condition for reconsideration or an earlier effective date is met.

Should I use new and material for a modern Supplemental Claim?

Modern Supplemental Claims use the new-and-relevant standard described in section 3.2501. Section 3.156 contains legacy and other distinct provisions, so the terminology should match the procedure. First identify the review system and the paragraph that addresses the particular evidence situation.

Put this information to use

See what your claim document supports

Start a free Claim Readiness Review to see what one document supports and what may be missing. Choose your document, then confirm your email to run the review.

One free review per verified email. The review does not predict a rating or guarantee a VA decision. You decide what to file.

Official regulatory text

38 CFR § 3.156

eCFR snapshot: September 3, 2026. Layout and spacing are adapted for reading. The full section and its tables are included below.

§ 3.156 New evidence.

New evidence is evidence not previously part of the actual record before agency adjudicators.

(a) New and material evidence. For claims to reopen decided prior to the effective date provided in § 19.2(a), the following standards apply. A claimant may reopen a finally adjudicated legacy claim by submitting new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously part of the actual record before agency adjudicators. Material evidence means existing evidence that, by itself or when considered with previous evidence of record, relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim. New and material evidence can be neither cumulative nor redundant of the evidence of record at the time of the last prior final denial of the claim sought to be reopened, and must raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5103A(f), 5108)

(b) Pending legacy claims not under the modernized review system. New and material evidence received prior to the expiration of the appeal period, or prior to the appellate decision if a timely appeal has been filed (including evidence received prior to an appellate decision and referred to the agency of original jurisdiction by the Board of Veterans Appeals without consideration in that decision in accordance with the provisions of § 20.1304(b)(1) of this chapter), will be considered as having been filed in connection with the claim which was pending at the beginning of the appeal period.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)

(c) Service department records.

(1) Notwithstanding any other section in this part, at any time after VA issues a decision on a claim, if VA receives or associates with the claims file relevant official service department records that existed and had not been associated with the claims file when VA first decided the claim, VA will reconsider the claim, notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section. Such records include, but are not limited to:

(i) Service records that are related to a claimed in-service event, injury, or disease, regardless of whether such records mention the veteran by name, as long as the other requirements of paragraph (c) of this section are met;

(ii) Additional service records forwarded by the Department of Defense or the service department to VA any time after VA's original request for service records; and

(iii) Declassified records that could not have been obtained because the records were classified when VA decided the claim.

(2) Paragraph (c)(1) of this section does not apply to records that VA could not have obtained when it decided the claim because the records did not exist when VA decided the claim, or because the claimant failed to provide sufficient information for VA to identify and obtain the records from the respective service department or from any other official source.

(3) An award made based all or in part on the records identified by paragraph (c)(1) of this section is effective on the date entitlement arose or the date VA received the previously decided claim, whichever is later, or such other date as may be authorized by the provisions of this part applicable to the previously decided claim.

(4) A retroactive evaluation of disability resulting from disease or injury subsequently service connected on the basis of the new evidence from the service department must be supported adequately by medical evidence. Where such records clearly support the assignment of a specific rating over a part or the entire period of time involved, a retroactive evaluation will be assigned accordingly, except as it may be affected by the filing date of the original claim.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a))

(d) New and relevant evidence. On or after the effective date provided in § 19.2(a), a claimant may file a supplemental claim as prescribed in § 3.2501. If new and relevant evidence, as defined in § 3.2501(a)(1), is presented or secured with respect to the supplemental claim, the agency of original jurisdiction will readjudicate the claim taking into consideration all of the evidence of record.

Cross References:

Effective dates—general. See § 3.400. Correction of military records. See § 3.400(g).

[27 FR 11887, Dec. 1, 1962, as amended at 55 FR 20148, May 15, 1990; 55 FR 52275, Dec. 21, 1990; 58 FR 32443, June 10, 1993; 66 FR 45630, Aug. 29, 2001; 71 FR 52457, Sept. 6, 2006; 84 FR 169, Jan. 18, 2019; 84 FR 4336, Feb. 15, 2019; 86 FR 15414, Mar. 23, 2021]

Related references

Browse the M21 manual library

Ready to review your own document? Start your free claim review.