Menu

Regulation · 38 CFR § 3.344

38 CFR 3.344: Stabilized VA Ratings and Reduction Protections

§ 3.344 Stabilization of disability evaluations.

You are reading a saved library version. Open the latest library explanation.

Claim Raven explanation

What this means

This regulation provides additional safeguards for certain ratings that have been in place for a long period. VA must consider the completeness of examinations and whether improvement is sustained under ordinary life conditions.

The protections in paragraphs (a) and (b) generally apply to ratings continued at the same level for five years or more. Other ratings are addressed separately. This is not an absolute ban on reductions after five years.

How this helps your claim

Build a timeline of the rating level and compare the old and new examinations. For a condition that improves and worsens in episodes, records over time can show whether one better examination represents sustained improvement.

What to check in your records

Use your decision, examination reports, and relevant records to check the following points.

  • Verify how long the same rating level has been in effect.
  • Compare the completeness of the examinations before and after the proposed reduction.
  • Gather records showing fluctuations and whether any improvement continues in ordinary daily life.

Compare the quality of the examinations

A reduction review is not simply a contest between two percentages. The completeness of the examinations and the evidence of sustained improvement matter under the applicable safeguards. Check whether the later report addresses the same relevant history and functional effects as the earlier evidence.

Build a timeline showing how long the evaluation remained at that level and what changed medically. Keep temporary fluctuations separate from the broader course. This helps explain whether the decision considered the duration of the rating and improvement under ordinary conditions, rather than only a single improved measurement.

Does the five-year protection mean my rating can never change?

No. It concerns additional safeguards for qualifying stabilized ratings, not an absolute prohibition. The duration and circumstances determine which provisions apply. Other protections, such as those concerning long-standing ratings or service connection, raise separate questions and should not be substituted for this analysis.

Put this information to use

See what your claim document supports

Start a free Claim Readiness Review to see what one document supports and what may be missing. Choose your document, then confirm your email to run the review.

One free review per verified email. The review does not predict a rating or guarantee a VA decision. You decide what to file.

Official regulatory text

38 CFR § 3.344

eCFR snapshot: September 3, 2026. Layout and spacing are adapted for reading. The full section and its tables are included below.

§ 3.344 Stabilization of disability evaluations.

(a) Examination reports indicating improvement. Rating agencies will handle cases affected by change of medical findings or diagnosis, so as to produce the greatest degree of stability of disability evaluations consistent with the laws and Department of Veterans Affairs regulations governing disability compensation and pension. It is essential that the entire record of examinations and the medical-industrial history be reviewed to ascertain whether the recent examination is full and complete, including all special examinations indicated as a result of general examination and the entire case history. This applies to treatment of intercurrent diseases and exacerbations, including hospital reports, bedside examinations, examinations by designated physicians, and examinations in the absence of, or without taking full advantage of, laboratory facilities and the cooperation of specialists in related lines. Examinations less full and complete than those on which payments were authorized or continued will not be used as a basis of reduction. Ratings on account of diseases subject to temporary or episodic improvement, e.g., manic depressive or other psychotic reaction, epilepsy, psychoneurotic reaction, arteriosclerotic heart disease, bronchial asthma, gastric or duodenal ulcer, many skin diseases, etc., will not be reduced on any one examination, except in those instances where all the evidence of record clearly warrants the conclusion that sustained improvement has been demonstrated. Ratings on account of diseases which become comparatively symptom free (findings absent) after prolonged rest, e.g. residuals of phlebitis, arteriosclerotic heart disease, etc., will not be reduced on examinations reflecting the results of bed rest. Moreover, though material improvement in the physical or mental condition is clearly reflected the rating agency will consider whether the evidence makes it reasonably certain that the improvement will be maintained under the ordinary conditions of life. When syphilis of the central nervous system or alcoholic deterioration is diagnosed following a long prior history of psychosis, psychoneurosis, epilepsy, or the like, it is rarely possible to exclude persistence, in masked form, of the preceding innocently acquired manifestations. Rating boards encountering a change of diagnosis will exercise caution in the determination as to whether a change in diagnosis represents no more than a progression of an earlier diagnosis, an error in prior diagnosis or possibly a disease entity independent of the service-connected disability. When the new diagnosis reflects mental deficiency or personality disorder only, the possibility of only temporary remission of a super-imposed psychiatric disease will be borne in mind.

(b) Doubtful cases. If doubt remains, after according due consideration to all the evidence developed by the several items discussed in paragraph (a) of this section, the rating agency will continue the rating in effect, citing the former diagnosis with the new diagnosis in parentheses, and following the appropriate code there will be added the reference “Rating continued pending reexamination ______ months from this date, § 3.344.” The rating agency will determine on the basis of the facts in each individual case whether 18, 24 or 30 months will be allowed to elapse before the reexamination will be made.

(c) Disabilities which are likely to improve. The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply to ratings which have continued for long periods at the same level (5 years or more). They do not apply to disabilities which have not become stabilized and are likely to improve. Reexaminations disclosing improvement, physical or mental, in these disabilities will warrant reduction in rating.

[26 FR 1586, Feb. 24, 1961; 58 FR 53660, Oct. 18, 1993]

Related references

Browse the M21 manual library

Ready to review your own document? Start your free claim review.